| Pages: [1] 2 3 |
1. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Thud There are still people out there who think the new bombers arnt good? Such ignorance is hard to believe. Bomber gangs can kill BS in seconds. I saw bomber gangs kill freighters + escort on there own POS,without having m...
- by Onizuka GTO - at 2009.06.09 10:01:00
|
2. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Bronson Hughes The Stealth Bomber has always been better suited to use in a gang; this has not changed. EVERY ship is better in a fleet, you make it sound like it's a revelation and a bonus. ==== Please note, we...
- by Onizuka GTO - at 2009.05.20 23:02:00
|
3. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Onizuka GTO on 20/05/2009 02:19:32 Originally by: Reisenkaze That's the issue, the DEV team posted on the EVE-search forums March 30th that they were beginning to play test the stealth bomber with both siege and cruise lau...
- by Onizuka GTO - at 2009.05.20 02:17:00
|
4. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Manticore signature has dropped from the destroyer-like size of 52m Into "special alloy" interceptor signature range of 39m!!! Nice! I have to test this out tonight, can't wait! Here's hoping this will make my survivability that little bit bett...
- by Onizuka GTO - at 2009.05.14 14:31:00
|
5. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Onizuka GTO on 13/05/2009 23:17:01 well you know how it goes, minority gets preferences and the majority is ignored. At leased I have something to look forward to when (if?) I start playing around in null sec... ==== Please no...
- by Onizuka GTO - at 2009.05.13 23:17:00
|
6. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: DeadlyBob Edited by: DeadlyBob on 12/05/2009 00:47:49 No offense taken Ranger, having a disagreement of principals is one thing, calling someone out and insulting them is another. I'm busy looking over your KB as we spea...
- by Onizuka GTO - at 2009.05.13 00:16:00
|
7. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: place1 I would like to know what the fit of that scorpion was as 4 SB should of had no problem breaking it. Anytime I have been with 4 bombers agents 1 BS the BS dies fast. So I must conclude that the BS was heavily tanked ...
- by Onizuka GTO - at 2009.05.09 08:59:00
|
8. Balancing - Identifying problems - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
1.Rockets It's Broken 2.Missiles It's Broken 3.Stealth Bomber You Broke it 4.Black Op Jump Bridge It's still broken ==== Please note, we have added a consequence for failure.Any contact with the chamber floor will result in an unsatisfactory m...
- by Onizuka GTO - at 2009.05.08 23:24:00
|
9. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Reisenkaze And I bet there are just as many people who were satisfied with the old SB the way it was. The only change I would have liked to see was the addition of the Covert Ops Cloak and the ship would have been perfect....
- by Onizuka GTO - at 2009.05.08 23:20:00
|
10. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Charlie chop Let me put it this way, if you find yourself in a situation where you have to fight a skilled group of SB and its support, you really got the odds against you. Even in your abbadon. If he's alone in his ab...
- by Onizuka GTO - at 2009.05.08 00:56:00
|
11. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Dibsi Dei I dunno, in null sec it is possible with dropping a bomb and warping off. Seriously though stop whining about stealth bombers. We wtfbbq ships of all kind with stealth bomber support in our every op. But wh...
- by Onizuka GTO - at 2009.05.07 00:15:00
|
12. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Dibsi Dei Originally by: Onizuka GTO Originally by: Dibsi Dei If you really need to engage some wtfomg100manblob you can launch a bomb and warp off. What other ship would survive engaging huge fleets anyway?...
- by Onizuka GTO - at 2009.05.06 22:45:00
|
13. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Dibsi Dei If you really need to engage some wtfomg100manblob you can launch a bomb and warp off. What other ship would survive engaging huge fleets anyway? ...except in low sec space, where it's not a bomb bomber but a ...
- by Onizuka GTO - at 2009.05.06 16:26:00
|
14. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: place1 If you look at my numbers the only time you actually need any TP is if that ship is using a AB anything else and you do full damage and yes I feel that is how it should be AB are great for reducing missile damage and...
- by Onizuka GTO - at 2009.05.05 11:27:00
|
15. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: CCP Chronotis Originally by: DNSBLACK CCP Chronotis Is SISI patched up yet with these new changes. Black Next week it should be updated with the changes. We will post here to let you know when they hit sisi. ...
- by Onizuka GTO - at 2009.05.01 21:35:00
|
16. Balancing - Identifying problems - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Onizuka GTO on 01/05/2009 08:23:03 Originally by: paddytehpyro 3. Torpedoes. Not really terrible but still...a slightly higher explosion velocity would be nice to make a torp raven viable. Hey, if the "generous" torpedo...
- by Onizuka GTO - at 2009.05.01 08:20:00
|
17. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: OilSlick Rick I am a bit disappointed in the number of implants available for torps compared to light/heavy/cruise. Does the ZMS1....with % to "decrease in factor of target's velocity for all missiles" work with torps? ...
- by Onizuka GTO - at 2009.04.30 22:40:00
|
18. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Stahanov Iv Edited by: Stahanov Iv on 30/04/2009 11:32:39 action: CCP change role of SB current role status : Weapon of terror. Primary target all Industrial ships(solo) secondary targets BS (required SB blob). Due to ...
- by Onizuka GTO - at 2009.04.30 13:31:00
|
19. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: CCP Chronotis Hi Folks, A small update on some changes we are looking at making. Bomb Velocity and flight time These have been tweaked a little further with shorter flight times and increased velocities. Chiefly this ...
- by Onizuka GTO - at 2009.04.29 20:58:00
|
20. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Charlie chop just one thing, i think that giving the stealth bomber that extra 10% explotion velocity will greatly improve its fighting chance since a AB BS will not be able to tank it. leaving enough chance to the frgis s...
- by Onizuka GTO - at 2009.04.29 00:29:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |